WANG Yang, MA Lina, LV Yanhong, et al
Journal of Clinical Radiology.
2026, 45(3):
498-506.
Objective To investigate the utility of habitat imaging (HI) based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the noninvasive prediction of cervical cancer (CC) risk. Methods This retrospective study included 247 patients with pathologically confirmed CC treated. According to the NCCN guidelines and Sedlis criteria, patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups. Using simple random sampling, patients were assigned to a training set (n = 173) and a test set (n = 74) at a 7∶3 ratio. Tumor lesions were segmented into k habitat subregions via K-means clustering on integrated mpMRI data, including DCE-MRI and IVIM sequences. Habitat maps were constructed, and the proportion of each subregion was calculated. Logistic regression was employed to identify independent risk factors and to develop clinical (tumor marker), HI-based, and combined clinical-HI predictive models. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The DeLong test was used to compare differences in model performance. Results Three optimal habitat subregions were identified. DCE-MRI-derived habitats (H1) were defined as follows: H1.1 (high wash-in, high wash-out), H1.2 (high wash-in, low wash-out), and H1.3 (low wash-in, low wash-out). IVIM-derived habitats (H2) included: H2.1 (low f, D, and D* values), H2.2 (low f, high D and D* values), and H2.3 (high f and D, low D* values). In both the training and test sets, the low-risk group exhibited a significantly lower proportion of H1.1 and higher proportions of H1.2 and H2.3 compared with the high-risk group (P < 0.05). Additionally, in the training set, the low-risk group showed a significantly higher proportion of H1.3 and a lower proportion of H2.1 than the high-risk group (P < 0.05). Logistic regression identified SCC-Ag, CA125, and H1.1 as independent risk factors for high-risk CC (OR = 1.074, 1.030, and 3.625; P = 0.031, 0.018, and 0.003, respectively), whereas H2.3 was a protective factor (OR = 0.009, P = 0.024). The combined clinical-HI model achieved the highest predictive performance, with AUCs of 0.814 and 0.818 in the training and test sets, respectively. In the training set, the AUC differed significantly between the clinical model and the clinical-HI model (P = 0.012), and between the clinical model and the clinical-H2.3 model (P = 0.042); however, no significant difference was observed between the clinical-HI model and the HI model. Conclusion The clinical-HI model provides a robust and noninvasive tool for preoperative risk stratification in cervical cancer. By integrating imaging-derived habitat features with clinical biomarkers, this approach enables accurate prediction of tumor risk, offering potential to optimize surgical planning, guide adjuvant therapy, reduce overtreatment, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.